Wednesday, May 13, 2015

The Shrinking Japanese Population

At dinner with five British friends, a spark suddenly sizzles through the conversation. Ears prick as the discussion begins. The topic? Sex in Japan.

We wade our way through fact and theory, offering in turn Chinese whispers about the contents of vending machines, the vessels from which businessmen can eat their sushi, and the fake nipples you can insert under your T-shirt to give the appearance of a constant erection. It is an exciting world, this one, so different to our own, where a brief glimpse of underwear seems to entertain the masses for hours.

Two years later, I find myself living here.

And it is in many ways everything I had giggled, exaggerated and hinted at with friends when the words were too shocking to utter.

There are entire shops dedicated to the selling of condoms, regular DVD shops which only retail the one variety of DVD, and seemingly innocent home depots which display plastic phalluses so big I could dress one up in 4-year-old’s clothing and push it around in a pram for a few weeks before anyone would be any the wiser. Only the other day I pulled up alongside a car while waiting at the traffic lights and glanced over, only to discover a guy watching full frontal penetration on his dashboard DVD screen. It was 11am.

Yet this is where I begin to get confused. In such an apparent and blatantly sexual society, why is nobody breeding?

The story of Japan’s declining birthrate is not a new one. Measures are underway to ensure that the country does not evolve into a giant nursing home. But in spite of the fact that the government is offering monetary incentives to young married couples, and that businesses are enforcing compulsory holidays, the percentage of children being born into the new generation is not increasing rapidly enough. With just an average of 1.39 children born per Japanese female, it’s time to take a look at the root causes of why such a randy bunch of Asians can’t get down and do it.

Tokyo exemplifies the coexistence of innovation and tradition. Outside the boundaries of the capital, however, it’s the time honored values which hold a much stronger visible presence. The family home is the most perceptible manifestation of these continuing traditions, with practices arguably proceeding beyond their relevancy date. Here, family members of every generation coexist under one roof, often in the same room. The youngest generation are expected to secure partners in order to maintain this strong family unit and support the elders through their retirement years. Now, more than ever, with the proportion of people above the retirement age reaching astonishing heights, there is an ever pressing need for this.

The pressure to get married is a predominant conversation topic for females as young as 14. The idea of women as “Christmas cakes”—an item which begins to decline after its use-by date of the 25th—still pervades, and the desperation to get married before this “spoiling age” is visibly apparent in Japanese social circles. In the past, young people were subjected to “omiai” (arranged marriage interviews, which to this day are not uncommon). Nowadays, especially in the bigger cities, parties where women pay to attend in order to find a suitably rich and respectable husband, have taken its place.

This pressure and stigma about remaining single pushes people into marriages they are not necessarily happy with. I spoke to one Japanese woman who commented: “I didn’t really like him at first,” with reference to the first few years of her marriage. Instead of looking for a person with whom they’d be entirely satisfied to spend the rest of their lives, people are just glad to be taken off the proverbial shelf. I asked some 24-year-old Japanese males what they consider to be most important when dating the opposite sex. The response came back: “She has to be nice.” Nice? Nice is the word they refuse to let you use after Key Stage 1 primary school education because it’s absolute bollocks. Everyone is “nice”—but using it as the basis for marriage?

Nice is not a spark, and there lays a crucial fault in the Japanese mating system. People are so keen to get coupled up that a spark does not seem to need to exist here. A body just needs to exist, and exhibit some kind of sign that it is “nice,” and then that body is deemed acceptable for marriage. When intelligence, a sense of humor, and similar interests fail to hold any importance, it is no wonder that people are not having sex. Nice isn’t sexy.

But then, what does it really matter, when after the initial 3 or 4 shopping trips made on the designated “couples” day, a few occasions of holding hands, and the subsequent marriage, the relationship will quickly dissolve into the occasional Sunday spent together when the man returns from work. Such is the fate of many matrimonial unions. The working lives of salarymen and OLs at Japanese companies is a phenomenon which has to be seen to be believed. It is not unusual for Japanese workers to leave the office at around 11 p.m. on a weeknight. Holidays, for most, are not even on the agenda. A large proportion of the adults I have come into contact with in Japan have yet to acquire passports. There is simply no need.

With so much time spent at work, there is very little left for play. Here is where the numerous variations of bars offering pleasure for money come into effect. The niche for a quick fix in this work-heavy country is a thriving market. In the same way that the convenience store allows one to pick up a quick bite for dinner with limited expenditure of time, money or effort, the sex industry provides a means for men to enjoy the company of women without having to fork out on the wining and dining required by a future potential spouse. It’s a case of satisfaction in half the time, for half the price.

Just as we see the way sex is cordoned off in the architecture of the cities—Shinjuku’s red-light district Kabukicho a prime example of this—the subject is discernibly curtailed in conversation. Around a table of Japanese citizens of mixed gender, sex does not exist. It is rarely mentioned, and certainly never with reference to oneself. This sense of secrecy extends even to the love hotels, where you cover your license plate, pay through a machine, and leave through a back door onto a quiet street. When sex is required to be kept a secret, it is regarded with connotations of negativity. And when something is viewed negatively, it tends to be considered taboo.

This notion of privacy is part of the persona of humility revered in Japanese society. While this modest and timid character trait flourishes in the business arena, however, it is the ultimate hindrance on the dating scene. For the Japanese, the approach of a stranger is an act of almost biblical transgression. Where big, open rooms in Western bars and pubs are designed with communication in mind, Japanese izakayas are sectioned off into private rooms. Even the “ping pong” buttons with which to hail the bar staff make interaction outside of your own known circle almost unthinkable.

You might think that such a reserved group of people would flock to the online services available, but wherever else in the world this style of dating is flourishing, in Japan it is still restricted to a few sites.  It seems that in this hush-hush society of shy males and females, if you don’t meet the love of your life at school or university, there’s a strong chance it might never happen.

So what is the solution? Put all the 30-somethings in a ring and tell them they can only come out if they’ve fornicated without the use of contraception? Or accept that being single isn’t “wrong,” and that neither is sex. We’ve just witnessed a national pop star shave her head for spending a night at a male friend’s home. Rather than focusing on these old, samurai-age techniques, Japan needs to modernize. Not only its dating style, but also its perception of men and women as these separate, shy entities, so that perversions can at least be shared, rather than expressed through a fanaticism for big-breasted cartoons in magazines. Mentally and physically, the Japanese need to let the rest of the world in.

Louis Chen

What Japanese Women Want

According to a study conducted by the National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, about half of unmarried women report that they are not dating anyone with any serious intent. Why are so many available ladies completely unattached? Could it be that they just don’t see the appeal of having a partner? Or conversely, maybe they are holding out for an unrealistic Prince Charming.

Goo Rankings decided to look into the issue and asked the single ladies what they would ideally want a boyfriend to do for them, if they had one.  

The answer most commonly given was, “He wouldn’t have to do anything in particular, just be there for me when I’m lonely.” On nights alone in our rooms or days off without any particular plans, we’ve all felt a sudden loneliness, so that’s hardly surprising.

The second most popular answer was, “When I’m tired or sad, I would want him to just take me in his arms without saying a word.” OK, now they’re asking for a little bit of mind reading, but still, if all you need is someone’s comforting presence, that’s not too high a demand.

Number three is “I would want him to take me to lots of nice places.” This one seems pretty normal too. With beautiful and romantic seasonal events like cherry blossom viewing in the spring and firework festivals in the summer always packed with couples, what single doesn’t wish for a partner on their arm?

From here on, the list gets a little more needy. Here are numbers four through 10:

4. I would want him to quietly and attentively listen to my complaints about daily life.
5. I would want him to take care of me when I get sick.
6. I would want him to sneak up behind me and suddenly give me a hug.
7. I would want him to play with my hair.
8. I would want him to cover me with a blanket when I fall asleep.
9. When we’re out and about, I would want him to hold my hand and walk close to me.
10. I would want him to arrange surprises for me.

Hmm, to each their own, I suppose, but if the number one thing you want from a partner is a blanket and some tissues when you get sick, you might want hire a nurse instead.

What do you think, readers? Does this list seem about right to you or like a case of bad expectations?

Source: Goo Rankings

Paul's Thoughts:

All I can say is that my experiences have been extremely negative. I find a majority of Japanese women shallow and dishonest. Oh the lying! I'd think it was just me if I didn't know so many men (Japanese and foreign) who are unhappy with their Japanese spouses. 

They are great for dating a few times since they give you what you want with very little fight.  After that they start seeing you as a "permanent"  partner.

First they want your English, then they want your ring, then they want your money and then they want your kids...or rather their kids. After that, you're just in the way.

Watch out for the ones who just want to use you for English lessons!

Friday, February 27, 2015

Japan's Press Clubs Keep Japanese People In The Dark

Anyone who is studying “Japan” including language, culture, and society etc., will find an unusual word -- “Kisha club,” “press club”. Kisha club was historically established in 1890, originating from a small number of reporters who formed a group demanding the Imperial Diet to allow them to sit in on session. 

Today, Kisha club is mainly attached to government ministries and industries, and their members generally belong to major Japanese newspapers, broadcasters, and wire services. But, here is one of main differences from the Western press club. The membership of the Kisha club is limited to major Japanese news organizations and excludes foreign press, magazine reporters, and freelance journalists etc., who might be triggered criticism. 

In other words, like typical Japanese “iron-triangles,” The Kisha club embraces a cozy relationship between politicians, businessmen, bureaucrats, and academic scholars. In fact, Katsumata Tsunehisa admitted in a news conference on January 30, that the  Chairman of Tokyo Electric Power Co. (Tepco), was entertaining retired Japanese journalists in Beijing on March 11, 2011 as Tepco’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant was hit by the Great East Japan Earthquake.  

That may be why no Japanese journalists from the  Kisha club has asked crucial questions during any press conferences held by Tepco, the Safety Agency, or the  prime minister’s office.

According to the annual PressFreedom Index released by Reporters Without Borders, the level of press freedom in Japan has continued the decline it started back in 2012. Falling from a respectable 22 in the 2012 index to 53 the following year, due in large part due to the government censorship of the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster, Japan declined another five points to 59 in the 2014 ranking. Although this new ranking is slightly worse than its neighbor South Korea, which is ranked 57th in the 2014 index, Japan now ranks lower than Taiwan (50), Serbia (54) Haiti (47), and even surprisingly the African country of Botswana (41). Japan is now only slightly better than Hong Kong (61), Senegal (62) and Tanzania (69).  

While the 2014 annual report by Reporters Without Borders highlights the censorship of Fukushima nuclear disaster as one of the primary reasons for the decline in the press freedom ranking, another important factor in the continuing decline of press freedom in Japan is related to reporter clubs that Japanese journalists belong to and how these interconnected clubs form an information cartel in Japan.  

Originally established in the late 1890s, Kisha (記者) or “reporter” clubs were meant to establish rules and behavior between journalists in Japan that belong to these press clubs as well as the relationship the kisha clubs have with news sources. Over the last 100 years since their creation, these clubs have been the most important factor in creating an information cartel in Japan by defining the basic relationship that exists between journalists and their news sources-bureaucrats, politicians, business leaders, the police, interest groups and consumer groups. The rigid rules of access and conduct established by the clubs impose powerful constraints on the impact, content, and slant of the media’s message.

While some have politely called kisha clubs lapdogs for the government agencies and other institutions and industries they cover, a more astute analysis is that kisha clubs are nothing more than information cartels that prop up the state and insulate the elite from sustained critical oversight. In a column written by Chalmers Johnson back in 1993, who was an expert on Japan and a professor at the University of California, San Diego, Johnson wrote that the clubs operate "under an implicit agreement that, in return for access to a government agency, political party, or industrial group, nothing embarrassing will be printed. Johnson further states that “until Japan relaxes these cartels of the mind, its process of internationalization is meaningless". It was not until 1993, that foreign journalists managed to gain access to a limited number of clubs and official press conferences albeit with restrictions as “nonregular members”.  

As far back as the 2002, Reporters Without Borders has identified the Kisha system of clubs in Japan as a problem and released a press statement, entitled “REFORM OF KISHA CLUBS DEMANDED TO END PRESS FREEDOM THREAT”.

Reporters Without Borders (Reporters Sans Frontières) today reiterated its call for the Japanese government to reform the country’s system of exclusive press clubs (kisha clubs), saying they were a "serious threat to the free flow of information". The organization was backing a similar request on 3 December by the European Union (EU) to allow foreign journalists the same access to information as the country’s major media outlets.

Reporters Without Borders in its 2008 annual, continued to bring up the issue of kisha clubs in Japan by writing;

The government, the media and financial circles kept in place the system of kisha clubs, which prevent independent and foreign journalists from getting access to some categories of news. Officially, Japan has 800 of these kisha clubs but some sources put it as high as 1,500. Most of them are linked to public bodies such as ministries and provincial governments, large companies, political parties and the Imperial Household Agency.

Members of kisha clubs in Japan also follow a practice known as blackboard agreements. It derives its name from members of a kisha club literally writing on a blackboard, news items or topics that the kisha members will not report on till a later date. These blackboard agreements are meant to maintain equality and standardization among the cartel members and limit the “scoop” factor between journalists and media outlets.   

An interesting and noteworthy event related to a blackboard agreement occurred in 1992, while the crown prince of the Emperor’s family looked for a bride. In an agreement with the Imperial House Agency, the Japanese press agreed to censor coverage of the crown prince's search for a bride, because the prince did not want the media to scare off his marriage prospects, and the media wanted to ensure it had access to the wedding. Interestingly though, since the foreign press in Tokyo was excluded from joining or participating in kisha clubs prior to 1993, they did not agree to the coverage ban. As a result, the Washington Post scooped the Japanese press by reporting who had been chosen to be crown princess. When it became clear to the Japanese press that CNN would be broadcasting the news, the Japanese press decided to amend the agreement and to announce the news. Since the journalist from the Washington Post was not a member of a kisha club, the golden rule of not scooping your fellow club member even if they are from a competing media outlet was not violated, which is completely counter to how journalism is supposed to work.  

While the passing of the State Secrets Law in 2013 contributed to the decline of press freedom in Japan in the Reporters Without Borders 2014 Press Freedom Index, the kisha club system has long damaged press freedom in Japan. Some would say that the kisha club system has transformed the media in Japan into co-conspirators while in the process, dumbing down public debate and stifled independent thinking.

Supplied with a better understanding of the kisha club system, it is evident that until the kisha club system is eliminated or extensively changed, the level of press freedom in Japan will continue to decline.  

The best-behaved reporters at the Kisha Club are the first to get information. All they can do is hang out with the authority, drinking sake and having fun, trying to please them.
But the bond between reporter and official runs deeper than the booze, the cigarette breaks and the office space they share. Their whole careers are intertwined.
Strangely enough, if a reporter started out covering Mr. Aso when he was Foreign Minister, basically the same reporter follows Mr. Aso for the rest of his life. As your pet politician rises up the food chain, so does the reporter who follows him.  In this setup, reporters play the role of protector, not investigator.
If the reporter gets some information about this politician’s rival scheming or something, he would warn him. You see? If your politician has a big downfall caused by a scandal, you have a downfall too, maybe getting assigned to some remote area. Then you can't write anything. You get black balled by the Kisha Club as being "a trouble maker".
Kisha Club reporters also give their politicians a heads-up on what questions will be asked at the press conferences. Sometimes the answers are even typed up and given to reporters in advance, making the actual event - a mere formality. 

All reporters get a taste of that at the Japanese Newspaper Association, which oversees and makes guidelines for the Kisha Clubs. They submit questions in advance, and when they arrived, seven stern-looking men are waiting for them at a long table. With harsh lights and sweaty foreheads, it feels like an interrogation scene from the movies. One of the men reaches across the table, hands them a printout of the questions they are allowed to ask and nothing else.

Thanks to: On the Media Org, Unryu Suganuma, Pinione

Japanese Media Self Censoring Grows Under Abe

Worries are growing in Japan about a trend of media self-censorship as journalists and experts say news organizations are toning down criticism of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s government for fear of sparking ire and losing access to sources.

No one is accusing Abe’s administration of overt meddling in specific news coverage, but media insiders and analysts say the government’s message is getting through.

“The media did, in recent years, play a much more positive role in making people in power squirm. In the Abe era, they have begun pulling back,” said Jeffrey Kingston, director of Asian studies at Temple University’s Japan campus.

“There is a chilling atmosphere that encourages media organizations to exercise self-restraint.”

The conservative Abe, who returned to office in 2012, had fraught media ties during his first term, which ended when he quit in 2007 after a year of scandals and ill-health.

This time, Abe wants to avoid the same mistake, experts say.

His appointee as chairman of NHK public television, Katsuto Momii, raised doubts about the respected broadcaster’s independence when he told his first news conference in early 2014: “We cannot say left when the government says right.” 

Late last year, a ruling party aide to Abe wrote to television broadcasters ahead of an election demanding fair coverage. Many journalists took the letter as a signal they should dampen criticism or risk losing access to officials.

“There have been cases of media self-restraint in the past, but they usually involved the imperial family, or, as after the 2011 tsunami and nuclear disaster, when media adopted a sober tone,” said Shinichi Hisadome, a foreign news editor at the Tokyo Shimbun, a feisty metropolitan daily regarded in media circles as less submissive than national media.

“I think this is the first time that criticism of the government itself has been so restrained,” Hisadome said.

Experts say the result is a far friendlier tone toward the government even among media that previously were critical.

“Criticism of the government has dropped sharply,” said Kozo Nagata, a former NHK producer and now a professor of media studies at Musashi University.

In one example of the climate, a producer of TV Asahi’s Hodo Station, a nightly news show known for not pulling punches, will be shifted to a new post from April because she would not heed internal warnings not to criticize Abe’s government, two sources familiar with the matter said.

An outspoken guest commentator will also be replaced, the sources said. Former trade ministry official Shigeaki Koga, who sparked a flap last month by criticizing Abe over a hostage crisis that ended with the killing of two Japanese captives by Islamic State militants, told Reuters he had been told he would not be asked to appear as a guest on the show after March.

TV Asahi told Reuters nothing had been decided regarding personnel or guest commentators.

Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga told reporters on Tuesday the government fully respected press freedom. Referring to criticism of Abe on television over the hostage crisis that he said misrepresented facts, he added: “Seeing that, don’t you think freedom truly is guaranteed in Japan?”

Journalists and experts, though, say the trend toward self-censorship has worsened since the hostage crisis. Nearly 3,000 people including journalists and scholars signed a statement this month raising concern about freedom of expression.

His appointee as chairman of NHK public television, Katsuto Momii, raised doubts about the respected broadcaster’s independence when he told his first news conference in early 2014: “We cannot say left when the government says right.” 

Late last year, a ruling party aide to Abe wrote to television broadcasters ahead of an election demanding fair coverage. Many journalists took the letter as a signal they should dampen criticism or risk losing access to officials.

“There have been cases of media self-restraint in the past, but they usually involved the imperial family, or, as after the 2011 tsunami and nuclear disaster, when media adopted a sober tone,” said Shinichi Hisadome, a foreign news editor at the Tokyo Shimbun, a feisty metropolitan daily regarded in media circles as less submissive than national media.

“I think this is the first time that criticism of the government itself has been so restrained,” Hisadome said.

Experts say the result is a far friendlier tone toward the government even among media that previously were critical.

“Criticism of the government has dropped sharply,” said Kozo Nagata, a former NHK producer and now a professor of media studies at Musashi University.

In one example of the climate, a producer of TV Asahi’s: “We’ve reached the stage where even without the government doing anything, mass media produce articles that cozy up to authorities or refrain from criticism,” Koga said.
“The public is not getting the right information to make decisions.” 


Oh - Chika Ohashi

A fresh new face in Japanese AV has taken the market by storm with her first movie. In fact she and her boy friend, Daisuke, and friend Amami have begun a new AV company that is outselling the older companies. Javzone features not only Chika but her friends she makes daily that she and Daisuke find appealing – female and male.

Japan Week: How did a girl from Kichijoji that went to Catholic schools, enjoys badminton, and still lives with her parents find her way to AV?

Chika Ohashi: Well I graduated from high school and wanted to travel around Japan before going to college. The more I traveled the more I did not want to go to college. I got back to Tokyo and my father said I needed to fins a job, get married, or move. So I went to Family Mart and got a job.

JW: What was your favorite place I Japan?

CO: Fukuoka definitely, I met so many interesting people from abroad there. I met Daisuke there and had a British guy I was dating. I brought Daisuke to his apartment and we all had a threesome together. We all bonded so close that Geoff still comes to see us and was in a movie with my friend Amami.

JW: Come again, Daisuke, Geoff, and you had a threesome and you still see Geoff while being with Daisuke?

CO: Sure, we are open minded and free spirits. We hold nothing as being wrong so long as we do not hurt anyone.

JW: Do you see you and Daisuke getting married?

CO: I do not want to get married. Marriage kills relationships. My parents met through a match maker in Tokyo. They got married and had me and my brother. They are so miserable like most Japanese couples are because they do not love each other they just wanted to get married to have a man support them and woman to care for them. I would die before getting into that.

JW: How do your parents feel about this?

CO: They really don't care so long as I pay my way.

JW: What is your plan for the future?

CO: Keep acting until I get too old and then just run the company.

JW: Does Daisuke fit in the future?

CO: Sure as long as he wishes.

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

Waka Inoue: The Interview

Turning 35 this year, Waka Inoue is still sought after for modelling.  Her figure is still awesome and in Japan age is everything, but Waka still has offers pouring in.  One thing though, she never does nudes.  Those nudes out there are fakes and she sues anyone when alerted to them.

Talking to Waka one finds a lady who is beautiful but foremost is intelligent and hard to pull the wool over her big, pretty eyes.

Japan Week: What caused you to begin modelling?

Waka Inoue: Honestly, my mother told me the money I could make as a teenager by modelling.  At 13, I began to model for Uni Qlo jeans and tops.  By 18, I was already into swim suits and bikinis.  My mother had been an actress, so she understood how to use looks to make a living.

JW: At times did you feel you were a body and nothing more?

WI: No.  Absolutely not, because I kept a sense of my identity and when I sensed a manager or agent was pushing me to do something I did not want to then I fired them.  I grew up with a strong sense of who I am and I never compromised that and never will.

JW: Some people will see you as this very endowed girl who poses sensually and see just that.  How do you deal with knowing that?

WI: I am not naive.  I know what some men do with my and other models work.  That does not define me though.  That simply points to their lack of morals, self control and their disdain for women as nothing but sexual objects.  I do not define myself like that.  Yet, I do know some models who do and they are alcoholics, drug addicts, and suicidal because they define themselves by their sexuality.

JW: Do you think your real claim to fame is your bustline as Mino Monta once said?

WI: I suppose but again that is not what I define myself by.  I cannot control what some has been, misogynist thinks.  Have you heard of Mino Monta lately?

JW: Point taken, and what does Waka want to do now?

WI: I stopped the bikini modelling in 2008, and basically I see myself continuing to do TV drama acting and also starting my own clothing line later this year.  It will be "Inoue W" brand and aimed at full figure women who are overlooked in the clothing market in Japan, especially in the department stores.

JW: So Waka is a business woman?

WI: I always have been.  I am a lady who has a brain and uses it more than I do my body.

Waka's personal blog

Waka's offcial page at her agent's group